← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/390/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Gajanan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Secretary Vithal Bhagwanrao Solanke And Anothers v. Laxman Jalbaji Waghmare And Others

2016-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A. I. S. Cheema3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2016 Gajanan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Khanapur (Chitta), Tq. & Dist-Hingoli, Through its Secretary, Vitthal s/o Bhagwanrao Solanke and another.

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

Laxman Jalbaji Waghmare, Age-60 years, Occu:Agri., R/o-Khanapur (Chitta), Tq. & Dist-Hingoli, and others.

...RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.S.R. Barlinge Advocate for Petitioners.

...

CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2016 ORDER :

1.

The learned counsel appearing for Petitioners states that the Respondents have

secured the order in Enquiry No.322 of 2015 on the basis of so-called compromise arrived at between the parties. It is further contention of the Petitioners that Petitioners who are holding the charge of the affairs of the trust, were intentionally not made parties to the proceedings and that order has been secured behind their back. It is further contention of the Petitioners that the Respondents have practiced fraud upon the trust authorities in securing the order in their absence.

2.

Since the order has been issued in the absence of the Petitioners, neither the compromise nor the order passed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner shall bind the Petitioners or shall have any effect on the right and entitlement of the Petitioners. If, according to the Petitioners, while securing the order fraud has been practiced, it is established principle of law that the fraud, if any, vitiates the order or the proceedings.

3.

In the facts and circumstances of this case, this Petition can be disposed of with observation that the order passed on the basis of compromise, shall not bind the Petitioners and shall not have any effect on their rights and entitlement. It would be open for the Petitioners to avail of the appropriate remedies for redressal of their grievances.

4.

With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.] asb/JAN16