← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/783/2025disposed off

Madhav Laxman Ibitavar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2025-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:1439-DB - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 956 WRIT PETITION NO. 783 OF 2025 MADHAV LAXMAN IBITAVAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr.G.R.Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.S.V.Hange, AGP for the respondent/State.

( CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. ) DATE : JANUARY 16, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

The petitioners, who are the employees of the respondent/Ashram School, are claiming the benefits of the scheme of the State Government for assuring the real progression. 2.

The issue has been dealt with consistently by this Court in several matters holding similarly placed employees, which reads as under :- [a] Vasant Thavara Rathod and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, WP No.2779/2018, dated 14.03.2018.

khs/Jan.2025/783

- 2 - [b] Bhimrao Uttamrao Jadhav Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others, WP No.2358/2013, dated 13.01.2016.

[c] Sunil s/o Tukaram Ukande and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, WP No.7256/2011, dated 02.12.2013. [d] Vasanta s/o Ashruji Bhusari and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, WP No.3861/2014 and other connected matters, dated 25.04.2014.

[e] Gangadhar Govindrao Mandewad and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, WP No.11822/2016, dated 02.12.2016. 3.

In the light of the above, the petition is disposed of declaring that the petitioners are entitled to the reliefs and directing the respondents to undertake the process, examine individual cases and extend the benefits in accordance with the Law and as expeditiously as possible and in any case within 8 weeks.

( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) khs/Jan.2025/783