← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/226/2013disposed offdismissed for default

Sudhakar Dattatraya Deomali v. Indian Oil Corp. Thr. Dy. Manager (Lpg) And ORS

2016-01-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar2 pages

(1) W. P. No. 226 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 226 of 2013 Sudhakar s/o. Dattatraya Deomali, Age : 43 years, Occupation : Business, P/o. Ms. Sunder Inden, M.N. No. 1857, Main Road, Phulambri, District : Aurangabad.

.. Petitioner.

versus Indian Oil Corporation, Through its Deputy General Manager (LPG), Marketing Division For Maharashtra State, 254-C, Dr. Annie Bezent Road, Worli Colony, Mumbai - 30 & 2 others.

.. Respondents.

.........................

Mr. Ajit B. Kadethankar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate, for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr. S.B. Deshpande, Asst. Solicitor General of India, for respondent no.3.

..........................

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 5TH JANUARY 2016

(2) W. P. No. 226 of 2013 PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Kadethankar, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the premise on which the show cause notice was issued does not survive. Subsequently, the appeal filed by the present petitioner before the Armed Forces Tribunal has been allowed and also directions are issued to the Government in that regard. The present petition was filed for an interregnum arrangement i.e. till pendency of the appeal, no adverse action should be taken.

2.

As now appeal has been allowed, purpose of the Writ Petition is subserved. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE ................................

puranik / WP226.13