Bombay High CourtWP/449/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Samarth Deelip Mahamuni v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-09-16Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala1 pages

{1} 43 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 43 WRIT PETITION NO.449 OF 2018 SAMARTH DEELIP MAHAMUNI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.R. Barlinge AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. A.R. Kale Advocate for respondent No.2 : Mr. S.V. Dixit. CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J.

& S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2020.

PER COURT:

1] We have heard Mr. Barlinge, learned Advocate for the petitioner. The leaned counsel submits that the petitioner has made an application seeking appointment on compassionate ground. The said application has not yet been decided by the management. 2] Mr. Dixit learned counsel for respondent No.2 states that the application fled by the petitioner seeking appointment on compassionate ground would be decided in accordance with law, on its own merit, within a period of 4 weeks. Said statement is accepted.

3] In view of the said statement, writ petition is disposed of. [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J] [CHIEF JUSTICE] grt/-