← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/173/2005compramised

Jayeshree Vishnu Gaikwad v. Laxmibai Vishnu Gaikwad

2024-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:19341 (1) 24 SA-173.2005.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 24 SECOND APPEAL NO. 173 OF 2005 JAYESHREE VISHNU GAIKWAD

VERSUS

LAXMIBAI VISHNU GAIKWAD AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Ojas Deshpande, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sharad Shinde, Advocate holding for Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. P.R. Tandale, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

26 AUGUST 2024.

ORDER:- 1.

The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly compromise terms in this appeal were entered into and the same were marked as "X". Those compromise terms, vide order dated 23.08.2024 were referred to the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for verification of the contents. Accordingly, separate report of Registrar (Judicial) dated 23.08.2024 has been received to this Court mentioning that the parties have voluntarily entered into compromise terms. However, as per the direction of this Court the appellant was directed to pay the amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- directly to the respondent Laxmibai Vishnu Gaikwad under Demand Draft

(2) 24 SA-173.2005.odt issued in her name. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the Demand Draft of Rs. 5,00,000/- is already drawn and it will be handed over to respondent Laxmibai today itself at Shrirampur.

2.

Therefore, the compromise terms are accepted and the appeal is disposed of in terms of those compromise terms. Decree be drawn in terms of those compromise terms. 3.

Pending Civil Applications, if any, are also disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde