Ramkishan Rajeshwar Chintawar v. Ramesh Papayya Chintawar.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

901 WRIT PETITION NO. 2654 OF 1994 RAMKISHAN RAJESHWAR CHINTAWAR

VERSUS

RAMESH PAPAYYA CHINTAWAR.

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P.P. Mandlik h/f Mr.P.V. Mandlik AGP for Respondents:Mr. N.T. Bhagat Advocate for Respondents :Mr. R.P. Dhase ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Date: July 25, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the Judgment Date 7.7.2017.

Mr. R.P. Dhase learned Advocate submits that inadvertently, his name is not mentioned in the appearance title on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 5. The name of Mr. S.V. Jadhav, learned Advocate is shown, who does not represent respondent Nos.2 to 5. This motion is allowed.

The name of Mr. R.P. Dhase, learned Advocate be shown on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 5. Corrected copy be issued accordingly.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) vbd