Bombay High CourtWP/390/2020disposed offdismissed for default

Rani Raghunath Pawar v. Sharad Baban Ghalme And Others

2020-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.390 OF 2020 Rani w/o Raghunath Pawar Petitioner

Versus

Sharad s/o Baban Ghalme & others Respondents Mr.A.T.Jadhavar, advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : ROHIT B.DEO, J.

DATE : 08/01/2020 PER COURT :

The petitioner, who is the plaintif in a suit brought for partition and separate possession, is assailing the order dated 07.10.2019, rendered by the trial Court, whereby defendant no.10 is permitted to pay costs, subject to which the "no written statement" order is set aside.

I do not see any reason to interfere with the order impugned in writ jurisdiction. The suit is for partition and separate possession and the rights of the litigants in immovable property are involved. It would be in the interest of all the parties if the controversy is adjudicated on merits. However, considering the

controversy, the trial Court is requested to expedite hearing of the suit.

Petition is disposed of.

(ROHIT B.DEO) JUDGE adb