← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/99/2000dismissedrule discharged

Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd Thr.Br.Managar A'Bad v. Venubai Bhaguba Phalke And ORS

2015-03-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO.97 OF 2000 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Aurangbad ..Appellant Vesus Pundlik s/o Patilba Bhagat & ors.

..Respondents Mr A.A.Joshi, Advocate for appellant Mr B.B.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents No.1, 3 and 4 Mr P.P.Patnil, Advocate h/f Mr P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.5 - WITH - FIRST APPEAL NO.98 OF 2000 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Aurangbad ..Appellant

Versus

Rajaram s/o Shankar Bhagat and ors.

..Respondents Mr A.A.Joshi, Advocate for appellant Mr P.P.Patnil, Advocate h/f Mr P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.6 Mr A.B.Gatne, Advocate for respondent No.8 - WITH - FIRST APPEAL NO.99 OF 2000 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Aurangbad ..Appellant

Versus

Venubai wd/o Bhaguba Phalke and ors.

..Respondents

Mr A.A.Joshi, Advocate for appellant Mr B.B.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents No.1, 5, 6 and 7 Mr P.P.Patnil, Advocate h/f Mr P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.7 - WITH - FIRST APPEAL NO.100 OF 2000 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Aurangbad ..Appellant

Versus

Sandu s/o Yeshwant Phalke and ors.

..Respondents Mr A.A.Joshi, Advocate for appellant Mr P.P.Patnil, Advocate h/f Mr P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr P.C.Mayure, Advocate h/f Mr S.G.Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No.4 - WITH - FIRST APPEAL NO.101 OF 2000 The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., through its Branch Manager, Aurangbad ..Appellant

Versus

Smt.Kamlabai wd/o Bhaurao Bhagat and anr.

..Respondents Mr A.A.Joshi, Advocatef or appellant Mr P.P.Patnil, Advocate h/f Mr P.F. Patni, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr B.B.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.7 CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 20th March 2015

PER COURT 1.

So far as the order of issuance of notice to the appellant is concerned, Mr Joshi has filed appearance for the appellant, as such the service is complete. Hence, the said objection is waived. 2.

The appellant undertakes to take appropriate steps for service of respondent No.3 and shall make endeavour to complete the service on the said respondent within period of four weeks. 3.

Office is directed to issue fresh notice to respondent No.3, returnable within four weeks thereafter. Notice be served by alternate mode of service i.e. by R.P.A.D. in addition to regular mode of service. 4.

The appellant to furnish the paper-book of the appeal within eight weeks from today.

5.

Failure to serve the respondent No.3 and failing to file paperbook within the stipulated period will result into dismissal of the appeals without reference to the Court.

( N.W. SAMBRE, J.) vvr