← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3113/2024admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Anoop Gopikishan Jaju v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

2024-07-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:12991-DB 1 909.CA-3113-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3113 OF 2024 IN ITAST/849/2024 ANOOP GOPIKISHAN JAJU

VERSUS

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Malpani Mohit Rajendra Advocate for Respondent/State : Mr. Bharaswadkar patil kalpalata ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 3 JULY 2024 PER COURT :

.

This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 23 days in preferring the Income Tax Appeal.

2.

Issue notice to the respondent. Mrs. KBP Bharaswadkar waives service.

3.

Considering the nature of the dispute coupled with grounds mentioned in the application and the fact that the delay is of 23 days, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. Office to register the Income Tax Appeal.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb..