Darshansingh Thakursingh Johar. v. Chandmal Parasmal Patni.

1 sa 64.1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 SECOND APPEAL NO.64 OF 1995 WITH CA/1014/1995 IN SA/64/1995 DASHANSINGH THAKURSINGGH JOHAR.

VERSUS

CHANDMAL PARASMAL PATNI.

...

Advocate for Respondent: Mr. P. F. Patni ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :09th AUGUST, 2023 PER COURT:

1.

The learned counsel for the sole respondent submits that the sole respondent had expired in the year 2010 and the advocate for the appellant has now expired. The court notice is issued to the appellant. The notice is served upon the son of the appellant, however, none has entered appearance.

2.

Since, the sole respondent has expired in the year 2010, the present appeal is dismissed as abated. Pending civil application is also disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe