Raosaheb Mango Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

931 wp.520.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 520 OF 2015 RAOSAHEB MANGO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Brahme Shailesh P. AGP for Respondent No.1 : Mr.P.N.Mule.

Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Mr.Rupesh Bora, Advocate i/b Mr.M.S.Sonawane.

...

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA and N. W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE :

29th January, 2015.

P.C.:

.

Mr.Brahme, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is eligible to be promoted as Education Extension Officer. There are vacancies available. The Petitioner has given various representations. However, the Respondents have not taken any cognizance of the same.

The learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad accepts that there are some vacancies available and, on instructions, submits that the representations would be decided on its own merits. In light of the above, we pass the following order: I.

The Respondent No.2 shall decide the representations given by the Petitioner (Exhibit - 'J' collectively), on its own merits, as per its policy in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably

931 wp.520.15.odt within two months.

II.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ N. W. SAMBRE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ndm