← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8743/2022delay condonatedrejected

Vishanu Rupchand Patil v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer U.T.P.H - I Jalgaon And ANR

2022-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

1 930 ca 8743-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8743 OF 2022 IN FAST/1040/2021 VISHANU RUPCHAND PATIL

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER U.T.P.H - I JALGAON AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Y. R. Neb h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. R. A. Tambe ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 11/10/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Leave to correct frst name of the applicant.

2.

Heard rival submissions. The applicant-appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 230 days in fling appeal, which appears to be caused due to his poor fnancial condition. The learned counsel for acquiring body as well as learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. 3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 230 days stands condoned subject to condition that he shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. 4.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. Civil application is accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-