Sunilkumar Kisanlal Kunkulol v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2024:BHC-AUG:20917 ca3706-20.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3706 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 928 OF 2018 Ganpati Rambhau Raykar and Another APPLICANTS

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3704 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 919 OF 2018 Sunilkumar Kisanlal Kundulol APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Aashis T. Jadhavar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. Rajdeep Raut, AGP for respondent - State .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 6 th SEPTEMBER, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is conodoned. Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

3.

It is, however, made clear that in case the compensation is enhanced by this Court, the applicants / claimants shall not be entitled to claim interest on enhanced compensation, for the period of delay.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/ca3706-20.doc