← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/841/2025disposed off

Namdevrao Limbale Charitable And Education Trust Aurangabad Through Its President v. The Union Of India Through Secretory And Others

2025-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:1519-DB 1 WP / 815 / 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 WRIT PETITION NO. 815 OF 2025 JIJAMATA MAHILA VIKAS VA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA JAFRABAD THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS AND 976 WRIT PETITION NO. 841 OF 2025 NAMDEVRAO LIMBALE CHARITABLE AND EDUCATION TRUST AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS AND 979 WRIT PETITION NO. 844 OF 2025 BRILLIANT KIDS ENGLISH SCHOOL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS AND 980 WRIT PETITION NO. 845 OF 2025 KHADKESHWAR SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 982 WRIT PETITION NO. 847 OF 2025 BAL VIDHYA MANDIR SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS TREASURER VINAY PANDURANG NAVANDAR

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETORY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for petitioner in all WPs : Mr. Dnyaneshwar B. Pokale AGP for the respondent - State : Mr. S.V. Hange (WP/815/2025, WP/845/2025, WP/844/2025, WP/847/2025), Mrs. P.J. Bharad ( WP/841/2025) Advocate for respondent no. 1 in all petitions: Mr. R.R. Bangar Advocate for respondent no. 5 : Mr. A.R. Nikam (WP/847/2025) Advocate for respondent no. 5 : Mr. S.R. Dheple (WP/845/2025, WP/844/2025, WP/841/2025) Advocate for respondent no. 5 : Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi (WP/815/2025) ...

2 WP / 815 / 2025

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 17 JANUARY 2025 PER COURT :

Petitioners claim about having admitted students under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, and are seeking reimbursement.

2.

We have heard learned advocate for the petitioners, learned AGP, the learned advocate for the respondent - Zilla Parishad and the management as well as the union.

3.

Writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondents, particularly respondent no. 5 - Education Officer and the Zilla Parishads concerned, to undertake the process, scrutinize the petitioners' claims and if they are found entitled to have the reimbursement, shall process it as expeditiously as possible and in any case within six weeks to the extent the petitioner or any of them are found entitled to have reimbursement, respondents no. 1 to 4 shall take immediate steps for releasing the money within six weeks thereafter. [ PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/