← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/407/2009disposed offdismissed for default

Gorakshnath Rangnath Ghadge v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2017-10-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 407 OF 2009 Gorakshanath Rangnath Ghadge

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

...Respondents

---- Mr. S.T. Shelke, advocate for petitioner Mr. S.M. Moranpalle, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3 Mr. A.N. Kakade, advocate for intervener.

---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 2017 PER COURT :

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that with passage of time under the interim order, the purpose of the petition gets worked out. Learned counsel for the respondent is not in a position to dispute the position.

2.

In the facts and circumstances of the case no further purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending. The same is being disposed of accordingly.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] nbs/c-227