Digambar S/O Laxman Karale v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

criap259.16 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.259 OF 2016 Digambar s/o Laxman Karale ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

..RESPONDENTS Mr Anil M. Gaikwad, Advocate for applicant;

Mr M.B. Bharaswadkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondents CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 8th February, 2016 ORDER :

Heard.

2.

Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor fairly concedes that except for the month of July, the entire record is in order and the card holders have acknowledged receipt of scheduled commodities, which were distributed through the fair price shop run by the applicant. 3.

So far as the issue about July is concerned, it is claimed by the applicant that the quota for the said month was not released in his favour. 4.

In view of above, further custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary, as he has produced the entire record before the investigating agency. In view thereof, ad interim protection granted by this Court on 14th January, 2016, is confirmed.

criap259.16 (2) 5.

The applicant undertakes to appear before the Investigating Officer, in case of any assistance required in the investigation and he is served with a notice of 48 hours in advance.

6.

The applicant shall furnish his address and mobile number to the Investigating Officer.

Criminal Application stands allowed in above terms. (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) amj