← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10666/2019admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Raosaheb Dagdu Sapkal v. Sunil Vitthal Jadhav And Others

2025-04-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:11405 194-ca-10666-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10666 OF 2019 IN SAST/1299/2019 Raosaheb Dagdu Sapkal

VERSUS

Sunil Vitthal Jadhav And Others ...

Adv. S. V. Bhosale And Adv. D. A. Naik, Advocates for Applicant Adv. B. G. Sagade, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Adv. M. A. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.3 .....

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : 15TH APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties.

2.

Applicant seeks to condone the delay of 20 days caused in filing Second Appeal.

3.

Perused the application and reasons stated therein. It appears that the delay has been properly explained. 4.

In that view of the matter application is allowed, delay of 20 days caused in filing Second Appeal is condoned. 5.

Appeal be registered, subject to removal of office objection and place for admission on 18.06.2025. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) Rushikesh/2025