← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/830/2025disposed off

Surekha Pralhad Gawande Alias Surekha Purushottam Palkar v. The Additional Commissioner And Others

2025-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:1523-DB 1 WP / 830 / 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 WRIT PETITION NO. 830 OF 2025 SUREKHA PRALHAD GAWANDE ALIAS SUREKHA PURUSHOTTAM PALKAR

VERSUS

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr. Kumar Gaurav M. More AGP for the respondent - State : Mr. S.V. Hange ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 17 JANUARY 2025 PER COURT :

Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and perused the papers. We have also heard the learned AGP.

2.

The declaration of vacancy by Collector, in purported exercise of the powers under section 16 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (Act) dated 12-09-2024, for failure of the petitioner to furnish certificate of validity before the cut-off date, as stipulated by section 10(1A) read with section 14(1)(k) of the Act, is the subject matter of challenge.

3.

Admittedly, irrespective of the bona fides and the efforts of the petitioner, she could not get a certificate of validity and it is axiomatic that she has incurred the disqualification by operation of law.

2 WP / 830 / 2025 No fault can be found much less illegality in the order passed by the Collector, declaring the vacancy.

4.

Petition is without substance and is dismissed. [ PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE arp/