Vithal Nanasaheb Aher v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 Cri.A-295-17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2017 Vitthal Nanasaheb Aher ...APPLICANT versus The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. S.R. Shirsat, Advocate holding for Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate for applicant Mr. S.G. Karlekar, APP for Respondent State ....

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATED : 21st FEBRUARY, 2017.

Order :- 1.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to avail of the appropriate remedy for discharge before the concerned court.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, we make it clear that liberty granted today will be available for the applicant only four weeks from today and in case the charge is not already framed. In case, the applicant approaches the concerned Court within four weeks from today by

2 Cri.A-295-17 filing appropriate application for discharge, the concerned Court to decide the same, as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing such application on its own merits and in accordance with law. Sd/- Sd/- [ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.] MTK