Balu Padamnath Wandhekar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 250.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 250 OF 2015 Bhanudas Shivaji Thange .. Petitioner Shri Narendra D. Sonavane, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. The Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are served.

WRIT PETITION NO. 144 OF 2015 Namdeo Laxman Khurange and others .. Petitioners Shri Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for Petitioners. WRIT PETITION NO. 556 OF 2015 Ramesh Anandrao Ghavane and others .. Petitioners Shri Rajendra S. Kasar, Advocate for Petitioners. WRIT PETITION NO. 806 OF 2015 Nagawade Adinath Sampatrao

2 wp 250.15 and others .. Petitioners Shri Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for Petitioners. WRIT PETITION NO. 808 OF 2015 Pawar Manik Shivaji and others .. Petitioners Shri Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for Petitioners. WRIT PETITION NO. 817 OF 2015 Kalyanrao Keshavrao Thite and others .. Petitioners Shri Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for Petitioners. WRIT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2015 Balu Padmnath Wandhekar and others .. Petitioners Shri Rajendra S. Kasar, Advocate for Petitioners.

3 wp 250.15 WRIT PETITION NO. 1123 OF 2015 Katore Nilesh Dashrath .. Petitioner Shri Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Respondent No. 5 is served.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 21ST FEBRUARY, 2017.

PER COURT :

.

Mrs. Deshpande, the learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents/State states that, subsequently, the Government has issued Government Resolution dated 12.02.2015, wherein directions are given to maintain the status quo and committee was appointed to make recommendation. The committee has submitted report and fresh decision would be taken by the Government.

2.

We have heard Mr. Sonavane, Mr. Gaware and Mr. Kasar, the learned counsel appearing for respective petitioners. 3.

As the Government has already taken policy decision to maintain status quo and further committee is also appointed to submit its recommendations and on the basis of the said recommendations the Government is to take fresh decision. In

4 wp 250.15 view of that, it will be of no avail to decide the present petitions on merits.

4.

Needless to state, in case if a fresh decision is taken by the Government pursuant to the recommendations of the committee appointed and the said decision goes adverse to the interest of petitioners, it will be open for petitioners to assail the same. So also if that decision is adverse to the interest of petitioners, no adverse action be taken for a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of decision of the Government. The writ petitions accordingly are disposed of. No costs.

[ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Feb. 17