Santosh Bhaurao Putwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 WRIT PETITION NO. 884 OF 2020 ARVIND DIGAMBAR BAINWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondents : Mr. S.P. Tiwari.

909 WRIT PETITION NO. 885 OF 2020 SANTOSH BHAURAO PUTWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.B. Narwade 912 WRIT PETITION NO. 888 OF 2020 SHRIKRUSHNA BHOJU THAKUR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.V. Salunke.

AGP for Respondents : Mr. S.G. Karhalekar.

917 WRIT PETITION NO. 893 OF 2020 SANDEEP BHIMRAO SAPKAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.B. Narwade. Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. V.M. Chate.

938 WRIT PETITION NO. 915 OF 2020 CHANDRAKANT PANDURANG WADULWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondents : Mr. S.G. Karhalekar.

948 WRIT PETITION NO. 930 OF 2020 SAINATH DIGAMBAR BAINWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondents : Mr. V.M. Kagne.

965 WRIT PETITION NO. 951 OF 2020 DATTATRAY RAJENDRA PANDHARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.M. Vibhute.

AGP for Respondents : Mr. V.M. Kagne.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED : 15.01.2020.

PER COURT :

.

It submitted that validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claim of petitioners are pending with the scrutiny committee, the same are not decided.

2.

Without issuing notices to petitioners, the respondents have placed petitioners on the supernumerary posts. In Writ Petition No.312/2020 the proposal has been submitted for the validation to the Committee on 26.06.2013, well within the time as contemplated under the Circular dated 30.07.2013.

3.

As the impugned action is without notice to petitioners, we quash and set aside the impugned action.

4.

In case, respondents want to take action against petitioners of placing petitioners on surplus or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to petitioners giving opportunity to show cause. In that event, petitioners can file reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondent-Committee.

5.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months. 6.

The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 29.01.2020.

7.

Writ Petitions accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) S.P.C.