Rahul Rajendra Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 937.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 937 OF 2020 RAHUL RAJENDRA JAGTAP

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mewara Rajesh H. AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S. G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 :

Mr. Chalak h/f . Mr. Rahul Pawar ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 23rd JANUARY, 2020 PER COURT:

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner is not yet decided, though pending since the year 2017.

2.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent no. 1.

3.

Mr. Chalak, learned counsel holding for Mr.

Pawar, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submits that the authority would decide it on its own merits.

2 wp 937.20 4.

In case the proposal seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioner (Page No. 18) is pending with respondent no. 2, then respondent no. 2 shall decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months.

5.

Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe