Enus Azamsab Pirjade v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 919 CA-13047.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13047 OF 2021 IN FAST/1702/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13054 OF 2021 IN FAST/1983/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13052 OF 2021 IN FAST/1985/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13048 OF 2021 IN FAST/1987/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13049 OF 2021 IN FAST/1991/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13051 OF 2021 IN FAST/1993/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13053 OF 2021 IN FAST/1996/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13050 OF 2021 IN FAST/1998/2021 ENUS AZAMSAB PIRJADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. H.B. Nandagavale, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. R.D. Raut, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

12 FEBRUARY 2025.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions.

(2) 919 CA-13047.2021.odt 2.

The respective applicants in these applications are seeking condonation of delay of 873 days, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay of 873 days in these applications stands condoned subject to cost of Rs. 1500/- each to be deposited with the Registry of this Court for utilization of Dispensary, High Court, Bench at Aurangabad and also on the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the period of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde