Walmik Mango Borse v. Soma Mango Borse

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.582/1999 Walmik Mango Borse ...

Appellant versus Soma Mango Borse ...

Respondent None present

CORAM:

VIJAY S.KULKARNI REGISTRAR (JUDL) DATED:

07/10/2015 1.

Perused record and proceeding. The objection notified by the office is that there is matter of payment of publication charges for issuing notice to the appellant by paper publication. No steps have been taken by the appellant to deposit the paper publication charges and to serve the sole appellant. There is no representation on behalf of appellant. Thus it appears that appellant is not really interested to prosecute this appeal. Hence, I proceed to pass following order. The appeal stands dismissed for failure to prosecute. REGISTRAR (JUDL) cnd.sa582.99