Akshay Sadanand @ Bhausaheb Unavane v. State Of Maharashtra
300.15crapln -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 300 OF 2015 Akshay Sadanand @ Bhausaheb Unavane.
.
...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent
.....
Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for applicant.
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, A. P. P. for respondent/State. .....
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J.
DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2015 ORAL ORDER :
.
The application is filed for bail. Both the sides are heard. This Court has perused the papers of investigation. 2.
The crime is registered on the basis of report given by Mr. Sanjay Sadashiv Sathe, lecturer of College. The incident in question took place on 29/11/2014 in the campus of the College. There was quarrel between two group of boys in the campus of College. Allegations are made that, present applicant came there and he gave threats to the lecturer complainant, when the lecturer tried to intervene in the incident to settle the dispute. Allegations are that, present applicant again returned with revolver and then gave threat of life to the lecturer saying that, why he had intervened to the incident. Allegations are made
300.15crapln -2that, the applicant has virtually put revolver on the head of the lecturer. Lecturer was beaten. Other teachers came there, then the applicant left the College campus.
3.
The submissions were made that, present applicant is behind the bar since 30/12/2014. The revolver could not be recovered as allegedly used in the incident in question as he has handed over the same to the other accused. The said accused is absconding, as per the submissions of learned A. P. P. 4.
It appears that, present applicant is studying in that College and with the hope that, he will improve his conduct and he will complete his education, this Court holds that, the bail needs to be granted to him. There are no bad antecedents. 5.
In the result, the application is allowed. The applicant is to be released on bail on his furnishing PR and SB of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand). The applicant shall not commit similar or any other offence, while on bail. He is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. If he attempt to tamper the prosecution evidence, the State can directly come to this Court for cancellation of the relief.
[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ] Tupe/03.02.15