← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/967/2015delay condonatedrejected

Jayshree Sanjay Lakudzode And Others v. Shaikh Salim Mohammad Abdul Sattar And Another

2023-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

{1} ca967.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.967 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 1475 OF 2015 Jayshree wd/o Sanjay Lakudzode and others Applicants

Versus

Shaikh Salim Mohammad Abdul Sattar and another Respondents Mr. Vishal Kakde, advocate holding for Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, advocate for the Applicants Mr. Patel Syed Farhan S. A. for Respondent No.1. Mr. A. B. Gatne, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 09th January, 2023.

PC :

Heard rival submissions.

The applicants-claimants are seeking condonation of delay of 262, days which appears to be caused due to wrong advice from their advocate.

Though the learned Counsel for the RespondentInsurance Company strongly opposed the application, but considering statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 262

{2} ca967.15.odt days stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb