← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/669/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Gulab Dattarao Suryawanshi And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-02-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

1 wp 669.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 669 OF 2019 GULAB DATTARAO SURYAWANSHI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. P. R. Katneshwarkar h/f. Mr. Patil Bipinchandra K and Mr. Patil Nileshsingh J AGP for Respondent No. 1 :

Mrs. V. N. Patil-Jadhav Advocate for Respondents No. 2 to 5 : Mr. Sachin Deshmukh h/f. Mr. N. B. Khandare Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. V. M. Kagne ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 10th FEBRUARY, 2020 PER COURT:

1.

We have heard Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned counsel holding for Mr. Patil for the petitioners and Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel holding for Mr. Khandare, learned counsel for respondents no. 2 to 5.

2.

Against the impugned order, the interim relief is operating since 16.01.2019. The elections are also over. The appropriate action

2 wp 669.19 was initiated by the respondent on account of some irregularity and illegality in the election process of respondent no. 6. This Court had granted stay to the impugned communication on the ground that the same was violative of the principles of natural justice.

3.

Considering the time lag and that the elections are also over and the reasons given at the time of passing interim order, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim order. No costs.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe