Bombay High CourtWP/757/2015admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ranoji Manoharrao Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

{1} wp757-15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.757/2015 Ranoji S/o Manoharrao Shinde Age 65 years, Occ-Pensioner R/o Sambhaji Nagar, Behind Sadaphule Nivas, Dhoki Road Kallam Tq. Kallam Dist.Osmanabad ..PETITIONER

Versus

1] The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Finance Department Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2] The Accountant General (A&E) 101, Mahrshi Karve Road, Mumbai.

3] The Account Officer (Education) Dist.Osmanabad ..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.N.D.Kendre,Adv. for petitioner.

Mr.S.R.Palnitkar,AGP for respondent State.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.

DATE : 21st January, 2015.

ORAL JUDGMENT : [PER S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] :

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing.

{2} wp757-15.odt 2] Mr. Kendre, learned counsel submits that the petitioner is retired on 31/5/2008. The petitioner is entitled for benefit of the revised pension as per Government Resolution dated 30/10/2009 in view of the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.8985/11 dated 9/5/2014.

3] It is not disputed that even the Review Application filed by the State against the judgment delivered by this Court on 9/5/2014 in Writ Petition No.8985/11 with connected matters has been dismissed. This Court in Writ Petition No.8985/11 vide judgment dated 9/5/2014 has held that the benefit of revised pension as per G.R.dated 30/10/2009 was also applicable to those persons who have retired in between 1/1/2006 to 26/2/2009. 4] In light of that, we pass following order :

a] Petitioner shall make representation/submit proposal for grant of benefits of revised pension as per Government Resolution dated 30/10/2009 to the respondent-authorities. The respondent authorities on receipt of the proposal shall process the same expeditiously and take decision within three months and if petitioner is found eligible shall pay the amount within a period of further three months. Rule accordingly made absolute. No costs. V.L.ACHLIYA,J.

S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.

umg/