Saiyyad Taibunnisa S. Jalil v. The State Of Maharashtra

316.15crapln -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 316 OF 2015 Saiyyad Taibunnisa S. Jalil.

...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra.

...Respondent

.....

Mr. S. V. Mundhe, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, A. P. P. for respondent/State. .....

CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J.

DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2015 ORAL ORDER :

.

The application is filed for bail. Both the sides are heard. This Court has perused the papers of investigation. 2.

The crime is registered on the basis of report of Rehana Shaikh. Complainant is labourer. The applicant is her neighbour. Allegations are made that, the incident in question took place due to quarrel of son of complainant and son of applicant. Allegations are made that, during quarrel, present applicant threw acid towards her and also towards her son-Zuber aged 17 years. Injury certificate of Zuber shows that, there was redness burn on the left eye, however, learned Counsel for the

316.15crapln -2applicant made statement that, Zuber did not loose eye. Injury certificate of Rehana shows that, there was acid burn over the right arm and face. In both the cases, injuries are described grievous, but extent of one injury is not mentioned. 3.

Submissions made shows that, since 13/01/2015, applicant is behind the bar. Considering the nature of dispute and aforesaid circumstances, this Court holds that, it is not desirable to keep the applicant behind the bar till disposal of the case. 4.

In the result, the application is allowed. The applicant is to be released on bail on furnishing her PR and SB of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand). The applicant shall not commit similar or any other offence, while on bail. She is not to tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ] Tupe/03.02.15