Pradeep Ramrao Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} crappln201.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2020 Pradeep Ramrao Shinde Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. R. D. Biradar, advocate for the applicant Mr. B. R. Kedar, advocate for the applicant.

Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, APP for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 21st January, 2022.

PC :

Heard.

This application is fled for withdrawal of appearance. At present, learned Counsel Mr. Kedar has instructions to appear for the applicant and he has already fled Vakalatnama to that effect. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B". Criminal Application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb

{2} crappln201.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 432 OF 2020 Pradeep Ramrao Shinde Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. R. D. Biradar, advocate for the petitioner Mr. B. R. Kedar, advocate for the applicant.

Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, APP for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 21st January, 2022.

PC :

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, charge sheet has been submitted in the month of November 2021. The learned Counsel, thus, seeks time to fle an application for amendment and also seeks leave to fle copy of the charge sheet.

Leave to fle copy of the charge sheet along with application for amendment.

Stand over to 18.02.2022.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V. K. JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb