← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/659/2024disposed off

Yogeeta Barkoo Harne And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Chief Principal Secretary And Others

2024-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:1144-DB - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 659 OF 2024 YOGEETA BARKOO HARNE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.706 OF 2024 SHAMSHODDIN SHARFODDIN KAZI

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.681 OF 2024 MANISHA SEVANAND THAKUR

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.682 OF 2024 UJWALA NANDU NIKAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS Mr.S.B.Ghatol Patil, Mr.Y.B.Bolkar, Mr.S.B.Solanke, Advocates for the Petitioners in respective Petitions.

Mr.S.K.Tambe, Mr.S.B.Narwade, AGP for the Respondent/State. Mr.A.R.Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y.G.KHOBRAGADE, JJ.) DATE : JANUARY 16, 2024 khs/Jan.2024/659

- 2 - PER COURT :

1.

These matters were heard for some time. The learned Advocates for the Petitioners sought a pass over to take instructions. 2.

On instructions, they submit that the Petitioners desire to withdraw these Petitions. In future, if there is any advertisement for recruitment through the Pavitra Portal, they would compete with all other candidates and if there is any legal impediment, they may choose to assail the same by taking appropriate remedy, as is permissible in Law.

3.

Considering the above statement and with the said liberty, these Petitions are disposed off as withdrawn on instructions. 4.

Needless to state, all contentions of the parties are kept open.

( Y.G.KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) khs/Jan.2024/659