← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/53/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Adarsha Gramin Shikshanprasarak Mandal Through Its Secretary Mallikarjun Nagarao Waghmare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-05-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

53.16cp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 53 OF 2016 IN WP/5013/2015 ADARSHA GRAMIN SHIKSHANPRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MALLIKARJUN NAGARAO

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners: Mr.Awale G.L.

AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.K. Kadam.

...

CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: MAY 02, 2016 ...

Heard.

In pursuance of the notices issued to the respondents, respondent No.3 has filed affidavit-in-reply. It is stated in the said affidavit that the order of which disobedience is alleged in this contempt petition has been complied with. In paragraph 4 of the said affidavit, unconditional apology has been tendered for the inconvenience caused to this Court as the deponent could not decide the

53.16cp applications of the petitioner within time adhering to the directions issued by this Court.

Therefore, upon perusal of the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent No.3, it is clear that the order of which disobedience is alleged in this contempt petition, has been complied with. Though, there is delay in complying with the directions issued by this Court, respondent No.3 has tendered unconditional apology.

The Supreme Court in case of Suresh Chandra Poddar vs. Dhani Ram and others [(2002) 1 SCC 766] has taken a view that even where the order of court is complied with, subsequent to receipt of notice of contempt, court should show judicial grace and magnanimity in dealing with action for contempt.

In that view of the matter, contempt petition stands disposed of.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/