Bombay High CourtPIL/26/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Bhausaheb Ramrao Patil Chikatgaonkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-06-28Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Public Interest Litigation No. 26 of 2016 District : Aurangabad Bhausaheb s/o. Ramrao Patil - Chikatgaonkar.

.. Petitioner.

versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, & 02 others.

.. Respondents.

...........

Mr. S.S. Thombre, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.G. Karlekar, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondents no.01 to 03.

...........

CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ.

& R.M. BORDE, J.

DATE : 28TH JUNE 2017 ORAL ORDER :

01.

The petitioner's Counsel submits that the purpose, for which the PIL was filed, does not survive by efflux of time.

02.

The Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

( R.M. Borde ) ( Dr. Manjula Chellur ) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE ...........

puranik / PIL26.16