← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/85/2020rule absolute

Uttam S/O. Maroti Sadavarte v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2020-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. G. Sewlikar3 pages

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 85 OF 2020 Uttam s/o Maroti Sadavarte Age 56 years, occ. Nil Convict No. 8093 R/o at present in Central Prison Aurangabad District Aurangabad Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra 2.

The Dy. Inspector General of Central Prison, Aurangabad.

3.

The Superintendent of Central Prison Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad.

Respondents Mrs. B.B. Gunjal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. V.S. Choudhary, APP for all respondents. CORAM : T.V. Nalawade & M.G. Sewlikar, JJ.

DATE : 31st January, 2020.

JUDGMENT : ( PER T. V. NALAWADE, J.) 1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2.

By consent, heard both the sides for fnal disposal.

- 2 - 3.

This proceeding is fled to challenge the order passed by respondent No. 2 by which, furlough leave application fled by the petitioner is rejected.

4.

The submissions made and the order under challenge show that the application is rejected on the ground that there is adverse police report. It is also observed that the surety i.e. the wife of the petitioner is not competent and he may not be able to bring the prisoner back to the prison.

5.

The submissions made show that petitioner has been behind bar for more than 9 years as life convict for offence of murder. This will be the frst time when he will be coming out of jail on furlough leave. Considering the purpose behind the scheme of furlough leave, this Court holds that the reason of adverse police report and the wife of petitioner may not be able to bring him back to the prison, cannot sustain in law as yet for no time he was released on furlough leave. Considering the purpose behind the scheme of furlough leave, this Court holds that furlough leave application ought to have been allowed.

- 3 - 6.

In the result, the petition is allowed. Order passed by respondent No. 2 is hereby quashed and set aside. Furlough leave application is allowed. Petitioner be released on furlough leave on usual terms and conditions and his wife be taken as surety. The other usual terms and conditions can be imposed. Rule made absolute in above terms. Petition stands disposed of. ( M. G. SEWLIKAR ) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) Judge Judge dyb