Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon Thr The Ex. Engineer, M.I.W. Div. Jalgaon v. Balu Daga Patil And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1562 OF 2021 IN FAST/1867/2021 RAMU DAMU SONAWANE (DIED) THR LRS VIMALBAI AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.3 and 4-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1a to 1d and 2a to 2e: Mr. V.Patil 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1578 OF 2021 IN FAST/1880/2021 BHASKAR SUKHDEV PATIL AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.5 and 6-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4: Mr. V.Patil 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1576 OF 2021 IN FAST/1897/2021 ARUN BHIMRAO SONAWANE AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.11 and 12-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 10: Mr. V.Patil

32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1574 OF 2021 IN FAST/1901/2021 PRAKASH LOTU PATIL (DIED THR LRS INDIRABAI AND ORS Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.R.patil (v.p. Filed) AGP for Respondents No.2 and 3-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.1a to 1d: Mr. V.Patil 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1567 OF 2021 IN FAST/1891/2021 BALU DAGA PATIL AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.8 and 9-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 7 : Mr. V.Patil 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1565 OF 2021 IN FAST/1888/2021 RANCHANDRA GOPA VANJARI (JADHAV) AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.2 and 5-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V.Patil

32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1570 OF 2021 IN FAST/1894/2021 PANDHARINATH BABURAO PATIL AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.5 and 6-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. V.Patil 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1580 OF 2021 IN FAST/1871/2021 KASHINATH LAXMAN PATIL (dIED) THR LRS VIMALBAI AND ORS AGP for Respondents No.2 and 3-State: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents No.1a to 1c : Mr. V.Patil CORAM : SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 21-06-2021 PER COURT :

1.

Present applications have been filed for getting the delay of 181 and 236 days condoned in filing first appeals. 2.

Heard learned Advocate Mr. S. R. Patil for applicant, learned Advocate Mr. Vijay Patil for respondents, and learned AGP for

respondents-State.

3.

Learned Advocate for respondents Mr. Vijay Patil has strong objection to allow the applications. He submits that no proper reason much less sufficient has been shown for condoning the delay. He also submits that day to day account of the delay has not been given.

4.

Though it appears that day to day account of the delay has not been properly given and the applications are loosely drafted, the Acquiring Body should not suffer due to the act of the Advocate. There appears to be some grounds on which the first appeals are rested. Definitely it will have to be considered that some time would have been consumed for getting sanctions from various departments and, therefore, taking liberal approach and taking into consideration the duration of the delay, the applications stand allowed, delay stand condoned. In view of above, applications for delay condonation stand disposed of accordingly.

5.

Registry to verify and register the first appeals. (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI) JUDGE vjg/-.