Bhagwan Pratishthan Through Its Chief Trustee Padma Vinayak Wagh And Anothers v. Bandu Dhrupatrao Dhakne And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1512 OF 2016 BHAGWAN PRATISHTHAN AND ANOTHER PETITIONERS

VERSUS

BANDU DHRUPATRAO DHAKNE AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS Mr.V.J.Dixit, Sr.Counsel h/f Mr.S.V.Dixit and Mr.S.G.Rudrawar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.R.I.Wakade, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr.A.P.Basarkar, AGP for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. ( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) DATE : 29/04/2016 PER COURT :

1.

Learned Advocate for the respondent/employee Mr.Bandu Dhrupatrao Dhakne submits on instructions that his objection with regard to the inclusion of the Management Representative in the Enquiry Committee, is restricted as against Mrs.Padma Vinayak Wagh and Mr.Vinayak Wagh. The enquiry has been set aside by the School Tribunal on the count that Mr.Vinayak Wagh was Member of the Enquiry Committee.

He, therefore, submits that the Management may opt for any other person from amongst their trustees to be included in the Enquiry Committee when the same would be reconstituted.

khs/April 2016/1512-d

2.

In the light of the statement made as above, the learned Sr. Advocate Mr.Dixit submits on instructions that the petitioners desire to withdraw this petition so as to proceed with the disciplinary enquiry as directed by the School Tribunal.

3.

It is in the light of the above and the statement made by the respondent/employee, that this petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) khs/April 2016/1512-d