Adarsha Education Society Aurangabad Through Its President Mazarkhan Anwarkhan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ 51 WRIT PETITION NO.1452 OF 2016 ADARSHA EDUCATION SOCIETY AURANGABAD THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MAZARKHAN ANWARKHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Jaiswal Sachin R.
AGP for Respondents:Mr.V.S. Badakh.
Advocate for R.Nos. 2 & 3: Mr.S.S. Tope (Absent).
...
CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: APRIL 06, 2016 ...
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned AGP appearing for the State. It appears that, the Respondent No.2 - University recommended the proposals of the petitioner seeking permission to open Sr. College has been favourably recommended to the State Government. The said proposals were for the academic year, 2014-15 and 2015-16.
In similar set of facts, the Division Bench of this Court in the case of
Rajureshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Takli Kolate, Tq. Phulambri vs The State of Maharashtra and ors. (Writ Petition No.12395 of 2015 with connected petitions) vide order dated 28th December, 2015, directed the State Government to consider the proposals submitted by the petitioners therein for the academic year 2015-16 to be the proposals submitted for the academic year 2016-17 without asking the petitioners to submit the fresh proposals or fresh deposits, along with the other proposals which may be received to the respondents in pursuance of the advertisement published in daily "Lokmat"
on 14.12.2015 by the respondents.
We adopt the same course and direct the respondent / State Government to consider the proposals submitted by the petitioners and recommended by the respondent No.2 for the academic year, 2014-15, 2015-16 to be the proposals submitted for the academic year 2016-17 without asking the petitioners to submit the fresh proposals or fresh deposits.
We make it clear that, the said proposals are to be considered while considering the other proposals received
by the State Government for the academic year, 2016-17.
In addition to communication of the order by the petitioners to respondent No.1, the learned AGP to communicate this order to the respondent No.1 through office of the Government Pleader, High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. On above terms, the petition stands disposed of. Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/