Anandsingh Sangramsingh Bayas v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

{1} wp517802.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.5178 OF 2002 Anandsingh s/o Sangramsingh Bayas Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.B.R.Warma, advocate for the petitioner Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.G.Chapalgoankar, advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr.V.G.Sakolkar, advocate for Respondent No.4. Mr.V.D.Salunke, advocate for Respondents No.7 & 13. Mr.R.N.Meshram, advocate for Respondent No.8. Mr.B.N.Patil, advocate for Respondent No.11.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : 12th February, 2015 PER COURT:

By passage of time, the petition is rendered infructuous.

While considering Special Leave Petition arising out of order dated 10.12.2002 in identical Writ Petition, being Writ Petition No.2487/2002, the Supreme Court has directed disposal of the said writ petition since it was rendered infructuous. Instant matter also raises an identical issue and as such, as observed above, by passage of time, the petition is rendered infructuous. The objections, which are raised in the petition, are rendered merely of academic importance and this

{2} wp517802.odt Court, in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, need not determine the academic issues. Writ Petition, as such, stands dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp517802