← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1540/2009disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Babu Sopan Sawant

2020-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

905ca1540-09

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1540 OF 2009 IN FAST/1964/2009 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

VERSUS

BABU SOPAN SAWANT ...

A. G.P.for Applicants : Mrs. G. L. Deshpande

CORAM

: SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 16th September, 2020 ORDER:

1.

It is an application for condonation of delay, moved by the applicants/State in view of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 2.

Heard the learned A.G.P. for the applicants/State. None present for the respondent when called out. The respondent is neither available in the Court hall where the video conferencing facilities are provided nor virtually available.

3.

By looking to the old nature of this application, I thought it just and proper to decide this application for condonation of delay. 4.

On perusing the record, it is found that there is delay of 391 days in preferring the appeal by the applicants/State. The applicants/ State could not file appeal within time due to procedural aspects. The delay was not deliberate. The learned A.G.P. submitted that important points of are involved in the appeal and urged to condone the delay. 5.

The respondent has not filed any affidavit so as to controvert the reasons assigned by the applicants/State.

905ca1540-09 6.

In view of the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of the Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & another Vs. Mst. Katiji and others, reported in AIR 1987 Supreme Court 1353, refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. As against this, when delay is condoned, the highest that can happen is that a cause would be decided on merits after hearing the parties. Making a justice oriented approach from this perspective, there is sufficient cause to condone the delay in the institution of the appeal.

7.

Having regard to the above reasons and discussion, the delay stands condoned. The application for condoantion of delay moved by the applicants/State is allowed.

8.

The appeal be registered after due scrutiny. 9.

Issue notice to the respondent/original claimant in the appeal, returnable on 28th October, 2020.

10.

Call record and proceedings from the reference Court. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) JPC