← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3838/2023disposed off

Govind Bhaskar Munde v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2024-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:30089 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // spk.odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3838 OF 2023 Govind Bhaskar Munde

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Panpatte V. S. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Dande Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar ...

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE & S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2024 PER COURT :

1.

This pertains to speaking to the minutes of order dated 17.12.2024.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an employee of the minorities institution. His proposal for approval has been rejected for not qualifying TET examination. However, he would submit that Clause (c) of the order pertains to the 'Shalarth-ID'. Unless the approval is granted, there is no question of 'Shalarth-ID'.

3.

Considering the facts of the case, clause (c) in para 6 of the order be deleted and instead thereof, the following be added : "(c) The Education Officer shall take fresh decision on its merit and shall not refuse to grant approval on the grounds mentioned in the impugned communication. The Education

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // spk.odt (2) Officer shall take the decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from today. The approval would be subject to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court."

4.

In Para 5 of the order, instead of Special Leave to Appeal (Civ.) No.8300/2021 (Priti Ravindra Warghante and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others), it be corrected as 'SLP No.17702/2021 (The Director of School Education Chennai 6 and Anr Vs. B. Annie Packiarani Bai and Anr.)'. In the same para, instead of the sentence 'By filing such undertaking the equities would be balanced while passing an order granting him the salary by allotment of 'Shalarth-ID', it be corrected as 'By filing such undertaking the equities would be balanced while passing an order granting him approval.'

5.

Necessary corrections be carried out and corrected copy be uploaded.

6.

Praecipe accordingly stands disposed of.

(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) (S.G. MEHARE, J.) Mujaheed//