Vaijanath Kishan Kadam v. The State Of Mah And ORS

1021.CA.1528.13.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1528 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 1944 OF 2013 Eknath Hanmant Halde ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS WITH CA NO. 1530 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2068 OF 2013 CA NO. 1531 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2072 OF 2013 CA NO. 1532 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2078/2013 CA NO. 1534 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2062/2013 CA NO. 1535 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2066 OF 2013 CA NO. 1536 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2144 OF 2013 CA NO. 1537 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2059 OF 2013 ....

Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for applicants.

Mr. K.N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. A.D. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ....

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

DATED : 29th JULY, 2016 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants, learned Counsel for acquiring body and learned A.G.P for State.

2.

Delay of 595 days has occurred in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application which according to me are just 1 / 2

1021.CA.1528.13.doc and sufficient, delay is condoned. Appeal be registered in accordance with law. Civil Applications are disposed of. 3.

In the event the appeals are allowed and the appellants are held entitled for amount of compensation, the appellants may not be entitled to claim any interest for the period of delay. ( P.R. BORA, J. ) SSD 2 / 2