← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/14064/2022disposed off

Kankuri Gramin Vikas Kendra Through Is Secretary Laxman Maruti Dange v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024-05-06Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

ca 14064.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14064 OF 2022 IN REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.18824 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4951 OF 2013 Kankuri Gramin Vikas Kendra, Kankuri through its Secretary, Laxman Maruti Dange

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others.

...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.Pradeep G. Tambade h/f Mr.S.S. Jadhavar AGP for Respondents : Mrs M N Ghanekar Advocate for Respondents 2,3 : Mr. A.G. Gandhi CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.

Dated : May 06, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Not on board. Taken on board in view of the order passed on 19.9.2022 in Writ Petition No.14573 of 2019 regarding tagging of this matter with the said matter. 2.

Present application has been filed for setting aside the order dated 20.9.2021 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) refusing registration for want of removal of the office objections.

3.

Learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Gandhi waives notice for respondent no.3. 4.

At this stage, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent no.4 as in the main writ petition, no relief was

ca 14064.22.odt claimed against her. The present applicant was desirous of filing the review petition to review the order passed in Writ Petition No.4951 of 2013, by which it came to be decided by this Court on 21.3.2018. It is to be noted that though review application was filed within time, there were office objections and they were not removed. The learned Registrar (Judicial) had granted time to remove office objections, however, those were not removed and, therefore, a conditional order came to be passed on 20.9.2021 by giving two weeks time to remove office objections. It appears that even during that period also office objections were not removed and, therefore, registration was refused. Now, the learned advocate for the applicant makes a statement that he will remove office objections on or before 20.6.2024.

5.

In view of the said statement, the impugned order passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) on 20.9.2021 to the extent of review petition stamp no.18824 of 2018 is hereby set aside. Office objections be removed on or before 20.6.2024. If the office objections are removed as aforesaid, the review petition be verified and registered.

6.

To be tagged alongwith the writ petition no.14573 of 2019.

7.

Both the matters be placed for further hearing on 24.6.2024.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) ...

aaa/-