← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1399/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Vaishali Dharamraj Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-04-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde2 pages

(1) W.P. No. 1399 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 1399 of 2016 District : Jalgaon Smt. Vaishali Dharamraj Patil, Age : 39 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. at Marwad, Taluka : Amalner, District : Jalgaon.

.. Petitioner.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, School Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2. The Deputy Director of Education, Nashik, District : Nashik.

3. The Education Officer (Secondary), Jalgaon.

4. Gramvikas Shikshan Mandal, Marwad, Taluka : Amalner, District : Jalgaon, Through its Chairman / Secretary.

5. S.H. Mundade High School, Marwad, Taluka : Amalner, District : Jalgaon, Through its Head Master.

.. Respondents.

............

Mr. Sandip Rathod, Advocate, holding for Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3.

Respondent nos.4 and 5 served (Absent).

(2) W.P. No. 1399 of 2016 ............

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 18TH APRIL 2016 PER COURT :

The petitioner has raised limited grievance in the petition, that though the proposal for approval of the petitioner's appointment has been submitted by respondent no.5, to respondent no.3, on 25th September 2012, no decision is taken by respondent no.3 on the said proposal.

2.

We direct respondent no.3 to take decision on the said proposal on merits, as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of four weeks from today and communication the decision so taken to respondent no.4.

3.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

4.

Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (S.S. SHINDE) JUDGE JUDGE ..........

puranik / WP1399.16