Shobha Uttamrao Nirwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

ca11684.15 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11684 OF 2015 IN FAST/1906/2015 WITH CA/11683/2015 IN FAST/2022/2015 SHOBHA UTTAMRAO NIRWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhise Vitthal D. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for respondent No.3:Mrs. Ranjana Reddy .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 8th JULY, 2016 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

In view of the submissions made by both the sides and the contentions raised in the civil applications, I am of the opinion that sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. However, there will be question of granting interest in respect of the delayed period. Learned counsel for the original claimants undertakes that the original claimants will not claim interest in respect of this period if the compensation amount is enhanced in the appeals. 3.

In the light of above, applications are allowed. Delay condoned. The original claimants shall file undertaking to the effect that they will not claim interest in respect of delayed period. Civil

ca11684.15 -2applications are disposed of.

4.

In first appeals, issue notice to the respondents. 5.

Learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Mrs. Reddy, learned counsel, waives notice for respondent No.3. 6.

Call for record and proceedings.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/