Sunil Dattatraya Muttepwar v. Purushottam Bhapkar The Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad

{1} cp98.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12326 OF 2018.

Sunil s/o Dattatraya Muttepawar Petitioner

Versus

Shri PUrushottam Bhapkar Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12314 OF 2018 Smita Sudhakar Deshpande Petitioner

Versus

Shri Purushottam Bhapkar Respondent Mr. V.P. Latange, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. P.V. Diggikar, AGP for respondent.

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATE : 29th August, 2019.

PER COURT :

1.

On a grievance of non-compliance of order of this court, the petitions were filed on 04.03.2019. This Cort was pleased to issue simple notice to the respondent making the same returnable on 15.04.2019.

2.

On service of copy of the notice, the office of the Government Pleader called for the instructions and in response to the instructions, the office of the Government Pleader has informed that the representation is already decided in compliance of the

{2} cp98.19.odt order of this Court. Copies of the communication dated 02.04.2019 and 03.04.2019 are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Alongwith communication, copy of the decision is also placed on record and it is stated that the petitioners are informed about the order.

3.

In view of the communication, it is clear that the grievance of the petitioners is now redressed. Nothing survives in the contempt petition. Contempt petitions accordingly stand disposed of. ( AVINASH G. GHAROTE ) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb/