Babu Hanmanta Mane v. The State Of Mah And ORS

1022.CA.1538.13.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1538 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 1936 OF 2013 Madhav Kashiram Wadikar ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS WITH CA NO. 1539 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2180 OF 2013 CA NO. 1541 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2116 OF 2013 CA NO. 1542 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2120 OF 2013 CA NO. 1543 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2184 OF2013 CA NO. 1544 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2182 OF 2013 CA NO. 1545 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2114 OF 2013 CA NO. 1546 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2118 OF 2013 CA NO. 1547 OF 2013 IN FAST NO. 2176 OF 2013 ....

Mr. G.K. Sontakke, Advocate for applicants.

Mr. A.M. Phule, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. A.D. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No.3. ....

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

DATED : 29th JULY, 2016 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants, learned Counsel for acquiring body and learned A.G.P for State.

2.

Delay of 606 days has occurred in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application which according to me are just 1 / 2

1022.CA.1538.13.doc and sufficient, delay is condoned. Appeal be registered in accordance with law. Civil Applications are disposed of. 3.

In the event the appeals are allowed and the appellants are held entitled for amount of compensation, the appellants may not be entitled to claim any interest for the period of delay. ( P.R. BORA, J. ) SSD 2 / 2