Sneha Swpnil Patil @ Sneha Jagannath Patil v. Swapnil Vasant Patil

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 12 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 19 OF 2025 Sneha Swpnil Patil @ Sneha Jagannath Patil

VERSUS

Swapnil Vasant Patil ...

Mr. P. H. Patil h/f Mr. V. P. Patil, Advocate for Applicant. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 21st APRIL 2025 PC :- 1.

None appears inspite of service on the respondent. 2.

At the outset, the learned Advocate for the applicant seeks liberty to correct the prayer clause by replacing the words "Civil Judge Senior Division, Dhule" by words, "Family Court, Dhule". Leave granted. Correction be carried out within two weeks from today. 3.

This application is filed by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of the matrimonial proceedings pending before the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Court of learned Family Court at Dhule.

( 2 ) 4.

It is the case of the applicant-wife that the applicant-wife is residing with her parents at Dhule. The respondent-husband has filed proceeding in the Court at Kalyan seeking divorce. It is the case of the applicant that there is no one to accompany her to attend the Court at Kalyan as the distance between both the places is around 400 k.m. Thus, He prays for allowing the application.

5.

After hearing the learned Advocate for the applicant and on going through the application, this Court finds that it would be in the interest of justice to transfer the proceeding from the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kalyan to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Dhule. The application is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

6.

After transfer, the learned Trial Judge shall try to dispose off the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within eighteen (18) months from the date of transfer.

7.

The applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. In case the Trial Court finds that the adjournments are unnecessarily sought, the

( 3 ) Trial Court may deal with such application, so as to compensate the respondent-husband, if he personally remains present. 8.

With this, application stands disposed off.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.]