Meena Sandip Chavan v. Sandip Dayalu Chavan

2025:BHC-AUG:28458 ( 1 ) mca22.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 947 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2024 MEENA SANDIP CHAVAN

VERSUS

SANDIP DAYALU CHAVAN Ms. Anushka Pansare h/f. Mr. Ashish Jadhavar, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Shrikant Sali h/f. Mr. Sohail Subhedar, Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 08.10.2025 PC :- 01.

Heard learned Advocate for the parties. This application is filed by applicant wife for transfer of proceeding bearing HMP No. 198 of 2022 from the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Malkapur to the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Majalgaon. 02.

It is submitted by the applicant that there are two children of aged 6 years and 3 years and it is difficult for her to attend the proceeding at Malkapur. There is nobody to accompany her. Two proceedings bearing RCC No. 284 of 2022 and PWDVA No 69 of 2022 are already pending in the Court at Majalgaon. The the respondent-husband has already appeared in the said proceedings. 02.

Considering the above, following order :-

( 2 ) mca22.24 i) This Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

ii) The applicant-wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. If the Trial Court finds that the applicantwife has sought unnecessary adjournments, the Trial Court may impose costs upon the applicant-wife, compensating the husband, if he personally remains present in the Court.

iii) If the respondent-husband makes request for appearing through video conference, same shall be considered by the Trial Court liberally.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2025/Oct25/mca22.24