Shadul Syd. Rasool v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

906-CA-6252-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6252 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2085 OF 2019 Syd. Shadul Syd. Rasool ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS AND CIVIL APPLICATION / 6275 / 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) / 420 / 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION / 6276 / 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) / 418 / 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION / 6277 / 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) / 414 / 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION / 4182 / 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) /2087/ 2019 ....

Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Advocate for applicants Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 22nd OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT :

1.

Leave to amend.

2.

Heard.

3.

There is delay of not less than 735 days in filing these appeals. Moreover, these applications were filed in 2019 and circulated first time today, causing delay of little over two years. 1 / 2

906-CA-6252-19.odt 4.

For the reasons given in the applications, same are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), provided the applicants shall not be entitled for component of interest or any other monetary benefits for the delayed period of 782 days, 735 days, 823 days, 825 days and 749 days respectively in filing the appeals plus the delay of little over two years in seeking circulation of these applications.

( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2