Balu Sahadu Thombe v. M/S Kinetic Engineering Ltd

WP-3632.03

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 3632 OF 2003 Kinetic Engineering Ltd.

.....

Petitioner vs Balu s/o Sahadu Thombe ....

Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3424 OF 2004 Balu s/o Sahadu Thombe .....

Petitioner vs Kinetic Engineering Ltd.

....

Respondents ----- Mr. B.S. Chondhekar, Advocate h/f V. S. Bedre, Advocate for petitioner in writ petition no. 3632 of 2003 and respondent in writ petition no. 3424 of 2004 Mr. Amol D. Shinde, Advocate h/f T.K. Prabhakaran, Advocate for respondent in writ petition no. 3632 of 2003 and petitioner in writ petition no. 3424 OF 2004 CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

28TH AUGUST, 2015 ORDER:

1.

The counsel for the parties tender across the consent terms and request that writ petitions be disposed of in terms of said consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ' 'X' for the purpose of identification.

WP-3632.03 2.

Learned counsel state that the compromise arrived at is not in contravention of any public policy and that it is beneficial to the parties. Learned counsel identify their respective clients and further state that the parties have agreed to the consent terms arrived at between them. 3.

In view of aforesaid, writ petitions stand disposed of in terms of the consent terms.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

pnd